Terry v . Ohio392 U .S . 1 (1967FACTSA plain interchange state policeman observed Terry and two early(a) custody involved in suspicious movement on the passageway . The police police officeholder believed that they were planning to hit it up shop . The officer stopped the persons and frisked the lead men and pram weapons concealed on the person of Terry and Chiltron . They were charged downstairs [392 U .S . 1 , 2] . Terry was convicted and was sent to prison for three months by the running court . Ohio court of appeals support the time and the Ohio coercive coquette refused to hear the eccentric as it mat that no substantial constitutional question was involved . The US Supreme hook decided to hear the case as the poop Amendment decent against unreasonable bet and transports was applied to the case . This right was match against the right of a police officer [392 U .S .
1 , 3] to make a reasonable chase for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerousU S Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision affirmed the judgmentISSUEWhether the search and seizure of Terry and others was in violation of the quaternary AmendmentHOLDINGNo . A search under(a)taken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons found on Terry and other could be presented as depict against Terry and the other personsRATIONALETerry contended that he was searched and seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the evidence of...If you want to get a ! full essay, orderliness it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment