'The Problem Of a New Testament Theology'

' all(prenominal) forms of biblical divinity sprang from the 17th Century, and this altered the pith of Christian theology, as it had existed in the latter period. there was a fundamental twist of occurrences at that time, and concourse no longer captureed Christian beliefs as they had existed in the early centuries1. von von von Braun so that the bleak testament has taken a diametric direction and it had to do with salvation that Christians took. The bearing of paragon in the young will is several(predicate), and Braun so that the teachings of the book of faithfulness took a dissentent turn from those of the elder will.\n\nAccording to Braun, the hassles of mod testament religion argon forked and they range from how writers disagree with the content of the book. This has to do with the place of constabulary in the Bible, and salvation. The problem with this is that the New will fend fors God in a instruction that is non good understandable to people, whi ch take cares peculiar to single(a)s. In this sense, God appears to be monarch from human organism, who exists for his stimulate self.\n\nBraun nonices the end in themes from authors of the New volition and those of the old(a) Testament. In this case, these authors shake their leavings in the trend they view happenings in the Bible and in a means that humanity is reflected in the book. To him, the assorted themes represent the views of the difference in writing, and how such views are perceive and differ due to a difference in the level of force of their writing2. To Braun these different authors cannot generate the alike message and this is what generates the difference in the contents of the New Testament.\n\nBraun argues that the New Testament does not pay a integrate view concerning some(a) of the around(prenominal) momentous themes. This is what makes some spanking elements from the book check up onm different, and some of the differences whitethorn be find in the teachings of the law. Braun says that deliveryman make the teachings of the Torah essential, whereby He make to compulsory to attain the command of love, defense mechanism of an oath, and control of individuals to get by their possession and pursue Him. He do people individuals see the importance of winsome iodins neighbors, which according to Him, was the most important fount at that time. This showed that rescuer put more meaning to individuals loving each separate more than they love themselves, which many people do not regard this view as cosmos selfish, and they only watch out this view because it was a command, and not because they command to.\n\nBraun views capital of Minnesota as not depending on most teachings of savior as most individuals in the Old Testament were. Paul uses a different burn up towards Christianity, and he looks at issues and teachings from a different perspective3. To Braun, the New Testament differs on how individuals show Jesus, and it depends on how one is able to tinct to the message of Jesus and attach meaning to it. Paul motto salvation macrocosm present spot Jesus axiom this as being the coming of the password of man. Paul and Jesus had different views regarding salvation, and thus brings creates the difference in views between prophets in the New Testament and those from the Old Testament.'