Bandura & Rotter, Molly Ringwald Character from Breakfast Club Essay

Bandura & scum bag, Molly Ringwald Character from Breakfast ClubThe wages for Clairs behavior was mainly dependent on the approving she received from her frequent peer group. She has a notion that she needs to be popular or approved in order to be seen as better in her school. Reinforcement would similarly be abiding by her parents so she is equal to(p) to shop with her families wealth. After she had bought some involvement materialistic, it makes her feel good. There was a battle of the reinforcement values in this movie. One was, as stated above, to seek flattery of her older known peers known to be stuck-up, condescending, and popular. The other is reinforcement of a more positive virtue. This virtue is as stated, thinking independently and fashioning choices in ones life for oneself instead of seeking approval from her snobbish peer group. This would help he correct her choices of behavior so they do not become repetitive. At the beginning of the film Clair wasnt to open to the later reinforcement but whence discovered it via introspection through group discussion. They discussed peer groups, virginity, suicide attempts, and assaults. Although many of the ways they talked virtually individually other had been derogatory in some way. Clair still introspected. When Clair was con priored roughly negative evaluations and opinions about herself, she became upset. Her expectancies had been almost the same throughout the movie until her introspection. She would any get upset, denial, switches the blame to person discussing the problem, or rationalized her behavior. An example of rationalizing would be her take for granted that Andrew would submit Hi. To Brain in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his tacky peers. This means possibility of being categorized as a defensive external. If Clair is a defensive external, then the Social Cognitive acquirement Theory would be in hot water. This is because the theory states that people who paint a picture that they are controlled by the outside are not suppose to be competitive. This is a hypocritical theory in comparison to the external locale of control. Clair needs to be approved by groups immediately or she feels left field out. Therefore, her expectancy in this situation is to be approved by others. This would also be known as sociable desirability. Clair also jumps in on bashing another person verbally when her peer does it. Thus, her exp... ...ce and a very new-made love in John Bender.The Defensive behaviors would line up with Rotters defensive external definition associated with Clairs expectancies. The idea of social comparison had been used by Clair and the new group during their circle discussion. They compared each other socially via peer groups and attitudes. Clair did use dehumanization as a tactic in conversation as well. Clair proclaimed herself better then the others solely because of her group and monetary status while calling Brian an donnish nerd and John a criminalistic drug burner. The burner remark was a midget hypocritical afterwards she had smoked it herself. She used the advantageous comparison manner to explain how each of them would treat each other on the Monday after the detention they would be back in school. She discussed how she would do the same thing to Allison as Andrew would hypothetically do to Brian. Use this as an example (Andrew Clair would say Hi. To Brain Allison in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his sporty peers stuck-up popular girls.) Lastly, Clair was using displacement, blaming her condescending peer group and parents for her condescending behavior.